View Single Post
Re: Motion
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Lloyd Gillespie
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 44x in 42 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 26
   
Re: Motion - 10-15-2007, 02:07 PM

Lying about others, in others threads, isn't nice, NObody... You're going to be getting yourself banned...

Lloyd

Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY View Post
Like in 30 Days of Night, Lloyd, "No god."

Both Ayn Rand and nature contradict themselves. Like you said: [Lie 1.]

"As to laws of nature, they are only our understandings of how she works. Nature needs no laws, she just is, and just happens, as she does. The laws are our abstract knowledge of her self-mechanics. Just as a car runs, so does a universe."

Cars, and the observable universe, run according to strict mecjanical laws, Lloyd. Yet the question remains simple, can there possibly be absolute motion?

I have my own thread, Dave, and you don't participate. Primarily I'm thinking because of its paradoxical nature. However, this thread is seen as a shot in the foot, like I attempt to negate chirality and Lloyd plasters chirality all over the place. I'm not all that retarded, Dave. [Lie 2.]

Your thread is about motion, and I ask you to explain how anything can possibly move if all things at their furthest refinement are the same? Or, do you, like Lloyd, claim that absolute motion is relative as well? [Lie 3.]


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Reply With Quote