Graybeard,
What you posted -
http://www.goines.net/Writing/time_space.html - would be a good counter argument to Peter Lynds' hypothesis. I like to simply follow the implication that "h" decreases as "c" increases. The frozen time is representative of absolute speed, and observed time as relative velocities.
Lloyd,
Good point, and that is why I am here, to find out what the "stuff" actually is and isn't. we can't just say that stuff is matter or energy without delving into what exactly the substance is.
If we both agree that it is based on spacetime - alive or not - then I agree. Though, as we have gone into in waves and out waves before, I'm not sure we will ever interpret the cause in the same respect. Perhaps only if mind and body were considered the same, then we wouldn't have to bother with the prime factor.