Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  Just wondering if these scalable dark photons could be described by the squares of energy? |
Certainly can Antonio, as long as one realizes, energy does not exist as a separate entity from the matter/particle/wave aspects of the dark photon. Of course, many use energy, without truly defining it. Einstein's formula is fine if one realizes the E, in E=MC^2, means GMEV, i.e., Group Matter Energy Velocities. It's easiest to see through the realities of an H-Bomb explosion. The bomb's matter and waves explode into a much thinner density of matter waves, as they all approach the speed of light interactions, and disperse extremely violently. All the same amout of matter/energy is conserved___Completely... It just seems few scientists have realized, the Group Matter Energy Velocities, are completely conserved___They're all still there, just rather violently dispersed. I see no difference at the cosmological or quantum levels, when all motions are thoroughly considered... Feyneman, in his QED lectures, clearly pointed out the dual aspects of the photon's particle and wave mechanics. He further extended the theory to QCD, and the newest version of his QED book, has further note updates to his original work, by other leading physicists...
Energy is always "Matter In Motion." Though the densities may be near infinitesimally thinner, the dual aspects of particle and wave, must always be present, at the photonic level...
Lloyd