Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie  Rascal, do you really think confusing the issue with more linguistic creations, actually adds to solving the problem of non-understanding? I think "timotion" can be eliminated from the confusion, don't you...?
Lloyd |
Dear Lloyd:
I suppose the combination of the two words (timotion) can be abandoned if and when a condition of motionless is observed.
Then there will be a state of no motion and therefore, no time.
In the interim, it provides a reminder-service comparable to that of Einstein's amalgamation of space-time - if and when one can be found independent of the other, the linguistic term of clarification may become obsolete.
Erstwhile, such terms prove useful as a reminder that until such time the terms can be seperated by the observation of space and/or motion w'out time, they are in fact inseparable.
No, I don't think - with the provided qualifications - that the terms add to any 'confusion'.
They tend more to simplify the compound issues.
On the contrary, I think - as qualiifed - the cited linguistic terms subtract from the confusion while they expedite and augment consciousness.
Post Script:
Several cohorts, upon encountering that term ('timotion') as I created and practice it, have commented:
"I wish I had thought of that".
It corroborates the philology - the evolution - of scientific language.
Contrary to your post's linguistics, I did not 'create' the condition, I invented a term that simplifies and accomodates it.
Comparable to Minkowski space-time and the existentially observed mass-field and concentric zero-center.
Best Regards,
- RP
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
Incidentally, Lloyd, a knowledgeable man has impressively conveyed to me that:
The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
(At least some of the previously subjected ducks, seem to be quacking in unison?)