[Profpat]

Originally Posted by ThirdWorld A brief summary of the new theory that proposes to hold the key to unlocking all physics phenomena is presented in this link: Building The TOE In Physics From Scratch.doc . What are your preliminary views of this theory? Roger

Hi Roger;

I gave it a cursory review and here are my preliminary comments;

1} It is an interesting theory, but I don't fully understand it. I should point out however I am an accounting professor and not a scienctist,

2) When do positive charges attract each other?

3) I know you looked at my Idea and I have the proton and neutron with positive and negative space, and therefore no problem with bonding. In fact I think it explains strong and weak nuclear forces. In other words there is a limit to the bonding.( I think this can be proved through computer simulation to see how many protons and neutrons can be bound before breakdown.)

4) I don't know why so many people have problems with strings as being the fundamental substance.
What could be more fundamental than a one dimensional planck's lenght string?

5) There are a number of other members of this forum that don't like strings either, and therefore may like your theory of UNOMA, but I'll let them make their own comments.

6) Like my Idea your theory isn't a TOE but a GUT, in that I haven't seen where you reconciled gravity, which is the crucial element to a TOE. ( As I have told by others )

I need to peruse your theory before I can offer any additional comments I might have.

Best to you Roger,

Pat