*** Thanks for showing interest. I must say I am impressed by your CV, I hope I am not being overly optimistic in thinking therefore that no bad science will pass before you as good science neither will good science (though new) escape your acknowledgements.
You said:
*** Extremely brief I will agree but where is the discontinuity?
From the eternal infinite particle of energy that I described to the fundamental particle of matter (the UNOMA) then to electrons, protons, nuclei and atoms with their surrounding field of forces, where have I left anything out?
Quote:
|
This type of concept has been tried many times and many times it has failed to explain known facts and observations.
|
*** This TYPE of concept yes, but not this very concept. Without my going through the tedium of presenting the entire theory to you I give you the privilege of highlighting any so called known fact of physics which in your opinion this theory cannot explain.
And I can almost sense it is going to be a very long day with you bringing up as fact the theory that like (positive) charges ALWAYS repel each other. If this is the "fact" you are talking about I invite you to bring it up let us discuss.
Ask whatever you wish, don't be afraid that I might not be able to answer.
Quote:
|
Sorry Roger but this just doesn’t even make the grade as a possible theory of anything. Is this all you have since your last visit a few years ago?
|
*** I'll mark your words. Let me see if you can be as bold when it all starts to hang out.
I look forward to you trying to prove my theory to be of no substance and to a fruitful debate.
Roger