View Single Post
Re: Truth not Theory
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
neutralino
Master
neutralino has a spectacular aura about
 
neutralino's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 736
Thanks Given: 31
Thanked 114x in 97 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep Power: 12
   
Awards Showcase
1st Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Truth not Theory - 10-30-2007, 10:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldcreation View Post
[/size][/font]

Are you saying the uncertainty principle should be removed from QM? Or, are you saying that QM should be removed from a potential T.O.E.? Or neither? Or both? (There are generally four ways of looking at things).

Are men equal to women? Are dogs equal to cats?

Thermodynamically speaking, do you think that the universe is a system in stable equillibrium?

The truth is, there are some things that are more equal than others.

Does your "truth of EQUALITY" have anything to do with something outside the domain of physics?

What is the point of your thread?

You write; "The truth of everything has been found!"

Has the truth (the mechanism) of gravity been found?

Has the truth of the evolutionary history of the universe been found? If so, have you found it? Explain.

Are your interest in posting this thread to find a solution to human conflict? That is what is seems from your first post.

CC


Finally, I've found a post by someone who doesn't believe in all this = crap. I really wish people (not you) would stop encouraging MJA and his "equal is all we need" nonsense that you get if people who do not understand mathematics attempt to try and use it.
  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to neutralino For This Useful Post:
Graybeard (10-30-2007)