[N0B0DY]

"How come they aren't explaining it?"

I think they try, but people don't want to hear it. As for blowing up the world, it wouldn't make a difference, as in zero difference, because there is no concept of time for putting you right back where you are now. The earth blows up, and Sally is born.

Lloyd,

I won't say you contradict yourself, but you are being inconsistent with what I remember you stating about the FS which you state again here: "...though I do think the void is FS in random linear motion..." You just seem to not want to believe it, so you proclaim both geometrical spacetime as separate from natural laws and FS as representative of spacetime. With your random linear motion as synonymous to expandable and contractible spacetime, allowing your aerodynamics and thermodynamics to function.

Again, although I see what you're driving at and agree with you for the most part about your contractive quantization method, Einstein stuck by his illusory remarks for a reason. As above, spacetime - past, present, future - are illusory pre-requisites to the conditions and laws you claim are separately real.

So what type of field model did Einstein advocate? If we take Einstein's words for what they say, and not discard them as him claiming certain things when having a peculiarly bad day, the necessary modes by which we think are the necessary modes by which the conditional fields are built upon.

I'm more newtonian than einsteinian and smolinian, but it is very easy to incorporate the new-visionary models by quantifying absolute space without altering the absolute state - like a simple white piece of paper contains every possible picture imaginable - all that is required is differentiating the wavelengths, which also explains red-/blue-shifting. It is subconsciousness that quantizes motion, creating our infinite light spectrum. Of which our finite consciousness is limited to the finite visible portion of that spectrum.