aren't apples and oranges both fruit?
true they grow under different conditions,
science & religion both have their explanations for fruit
but if pitted one against the other,
or if only one may be chosen,
then to be a scientist is to say i do not believe in religion,
but do the religious say i do not believe in science?
to me,
one way believes everything is the result of some unknown power,
and the other believes everything is the result of some
known power,
both believe in power,
so why would they argue for their way of:
(seeing, perceiving, drawing conclusions) > believing...
(why the power struggle?)
so now what? what if they're both wrong, or both only
partially right?
a Theory of Everything
would imply that both would be factored into the
equation-prayer 