The theory of everything as originally postulated in "Hyperspace" by M. Kako is in fact the basis for the Unified Field Theory. Recent work by Holger Nielsen and Rendallz have not combined the subtle energies involved with scalar entities (ZPE), and even though Einstien had addressed them by reference in the general theory, did not define it in the vector mathematics, nor did he address curved space-time in the hyperbolic functions. Such levels can only be reached in quaternian systems as recent work of Dr. Pao Lu, Dr. T.E. Bearden, Bedini, and others. The subtle energies and scalars were addressed in the orginal 20 equations and 20 variables in Maxwell's theories, and defined by Whittaker in 1904. When one combines Whittaker to the equations of Maxwell, the work of Faraday, Hertz, Tesla, Einstein, DeBroglie, etc. Then the unified field thoery has already been completed "Theory of Everything". Whittaker combines electromagnetics with relativity, with gravitation, with optics and with subtle (scalar) energies. Since this work is over 100 years old, my question is why it has taken so long to be understood? Is it because of Gibbs, Heaviside and Lorentz distortions, or the development of lazy mathematics (Tensor, Vector, High-Topology in 2D and 3D)? Or is it more fundamental, only 4 of 20 equations were used in the formulations of Vector and Tesor math, and only 2 of 20 variables; becoming dogmatic among physicists, mathematicians, electrodynamacists, and thus unchangeable, they have made it a religion?
Scalar and quaternian open the cornacopia! So called "Laws of Nature" are no such thing, Nature will allow you to do anything you find out how to do; "Mans" natural laws of physics are no such thing, they are rules that apply to a very narrow region of variables, if you go outside that region, and the variables change or increase, the rules no longer apply, so we say they are violated, but in point of fact, are not. The laws of Thermodynamics have never been in total compliance, HVAC was excluded from the model, as were subtle energies, as were assymetrical systems, even if reguaged. The " Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory,” shows clearly that assymetrical or open systems do not apply to classical thermodynamics. Nature (Tornadoes) violate the fundamental basis of the laws of thermodynamics, Lightning and Sprites violate the apparent law of the conservation of energy, but in fact do not, as it is utilizing ZPE to form the bolt of energy, as was duplicated by Tesla in 1908. Many new devices and many older devices apparently violate the laws of thermodynamics in having co-efficients of performance greater than one, in fact the reason HVAC was excluded by the model, it had COP greater than 9, recently 18; Solar cells and wind turbines being open systems, have a COP of infinity, as do some magnetic devices. But are ignored by "Dogmatic Scientists" of the current "Institutions". Though they admit the solar cells work, and wind machines work, they believe that there are still no substitutes for delpeteable resources (They are paid to believe that, they have sold their integrity).
The unified field may be identified and new devices (originally designed over 100 years ago), will be done by the incomming freshmen of those same institutions.
I hope I am still around to be able to teach those students.
Supplimental reading:
"Gabriel Kron on Tensor Analysis, A bibliographical record," BEAMA Journal, Aug. 1948
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1963, Vol. II
Robert H. Romer, "Heat is not a noun," American Journal of Physics, 69(2), Feb. 2001, p. 107-109
Shoukai Wang and D.D.L. Chung, "Apparent negative electrical resistance in carbon fiber composites," Composites, Part B, Vol. 30, 1999, p. 579-590.
J.-L. Naudin's website at
http://jnaudin.free.fr/cnr/
T. E. Bearden, "Intriguing Novelties and Speculations: Part I of II," Explore 10(1), 2000, p. 40-48; Part II of II, Explore 10(2), 2001, p. 63-69
T. E. Bearden, "Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole," Journal of New Energy, 5(1), Summer 2000, p. 11-23
Robert Bruce Lindsay and Henry Margenau, Foundations of Physics, Dover, New York, 196
Willis E. Lamb, Jr. and Robert C. Retherford, “Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method,” Physical Review, 72(3), Aug. 1, 1947, p. 241-243
See T.D. Lee, "Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions," Physical Review, 104(1), Oct. 1, 1956, p. 254-259; T. D. Lee, Reinhard Oehme, and C. N. Yang, "Remarks on Possible Noninvariance under Time Reversal and Charge Conjugation," Physical Review, 106(2), 1957, p. 340-345; T. D. Lee, "Weak Interactions and Nonconservation of Parity," Nobel Lecture, Dec. 11, 1957; C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes and R. P. Hudson, Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay," Physical Review, Vol. 105, 1957, p. 1413
See Ilya Prigogine (with G. Nicolis), Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations, Wiley, New York, 1977; Ilya Prigogine with D. Kondepudi, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, Wiley, Chichester, 1998.
J. D. Jackson, "Surface charges on circuit wires and resistors play three roles," American Journal of Physics, 64(7), July 1996, p. 855-870.
H. A. Lorentz, Vorlesungen über Theoretische Physik an der Universität Leiden, Vol. V, Die Maxwellsche Theorie (1900-1902), Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig, 1931, "Die Energie im elektromagnetischen Feld," p. 179-186
Craig F. Bohren, "How can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it?" American Journal of Physics, 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 323-327
D.S. Jones, The Theory of Electromagnetism, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1964, p. 52
J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wylie, 1975, p. 237
C. J. Carpenter, "Electromagnetic energy and power in terms of charges and potentials instead of fields," IEE Proceedings A (Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education), (UK), 136A(2), Mar. 1989, p. 55-65
. A. Ferreira, "Application of the Poynting vector for power conditioning and conversion," IEEE Transactions on Education, 31(4), Nov. 1988, p. 257-264.
M. W. Evans (Ed.), Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Wiley, 2001, 3 vols
"Operator Derivation of the Gauge Invariant Proca and Lehnert Equation: Elimination of the Lorentz Condition," Foundations of Physics, 39(7), 2000, p. 1123-1130; — "Effect of Vacuum Energy on the Atomic Spectra," Foundations of Physics Letters, 13(3), June 2000, p. 289-296; — "Runaway Solutions of the Lehnert Equations: The Possibility of Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Optik, 111(9), 2000, p. 407-409; —"Classical Electrodynamics Without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Physica Scripta 61(5), May 2000, p. 513-517. Particularly see M. W. Evans, P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden et al., "The New Maxwell Electrodynamic Equations: New Tools for New Technologies. A Collection of 60 papers from the Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study. Published as a Special Issue of the Journal of New Energy, 4(3), Winter 1999. 335 p
Evans et al., "Inconsistencies of U(1) Gauge Field Theory in Electrodynamics: The Inverse Faraday Effect," DOE web site; — "Interferometry in Higher Symmetry Forms of Electrodynamics and Physical Optics," Physica Scripta, 61(1), Jan. 2000, p. 79-82; — Inconsistencies in the U(1) Theory of Electrodynamics: Stress Energy Momentum Tensor," Foundations of Physics Letters, 12(2), Apr. 1999, p. 187; — "Empirical Evidence for Non-Abelian Electrodynamics and Theoretical Development," submitted to Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie; — "Equations of the Yang-Mills Theory of Classical Electrodynamics," Optik (in press).
Lakhtakia, A. (ed.), Essays on the Formal Aspects of Electromagnetic Theory, World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 1993, p. 6-86
With this, and the next few posts, you can form the "New TOE, or Unified Field Theory".
Prof. Palmer