[ThirdWorld]

Thirdworld, it sounds like the theory is unpolished and not ready for experts to read it.

1. Experts would not read it because it contains formatting errors.
2. Experts would not read it because it does not contain your full name.
3. Experts would not read it because it contains no contact information.

*** I'm not sure I know what you are referring to as my theory. Do you mean the abstract of sorts I presented at the beginning of this thread?

I presented that summary expecting that preliminary comments would be made on the contents of my theory in this forum. If something more formal is required I will be only to happy to come up with that but some feedback on the ideas I presented here could provide me with a good guide as to what of the presentation of a theory really catches the eyes of the experts.

Like I said I already have a 70 page paper that outlines the theory so I can customize it to suit what the experts find palatable.

So far it does not seem to me that much interest is paid to content, but much seems to be given to appeal.

I suggest you read my theory, your PM suggested that you think gravitons do not circle the earth and simply fall causing gravity,

*** I browsed through the chapter you provided but I made the mistake the first time I looked at it of thinking that David Bohm's ideas were yours.

Your idea of "self propulsion" of particles is quite accurately described in Dlvwing's theory on Toronics, in which motion is a consquence of a symmetry break and further more, this is conclusive enough mathematically to disprove that particles are ever at rest, ever.

*** I haven't read that theory but it is nice to know that we have some common ideas: my particle of energy, though of zero size, has the space parameter of orientation. This means that there is asymmetry within it and I have conceptualized it as such. So maybe and hopefully indeed Dlvwing's ideas and mine agree here.

Those energy particles are constantly accelerating and I have estimated that they might reach the speed of light within fractions of a mm. For large objects they travel hundreds of thousands of kilo meters so the speed they attain is unimaginable.

Who suggested that photons did not move? Please answer this, I mean no disrespect.

*** I am not sure what you are referring to here, however, photons are UNOMAS in my theory and these are not the energy particles that are in constant acceleration. UNOMAS have finite size and may easily contain billions of the energy particles.

UNOMAS can come to rest and combine to form electrons, protons, nuclei and all other intermediate particles and atoms.

So I am claiming that photons can and do come to rest and therefore I might have referred to photons at rest earlier.

For information, I also said that these UNOMAS [photons] are gyrating constantly, so when I say photon at rest I mean photon that is not in translational motion. It is however in motion of vibration.


Roger