Dear Rascal ... How goes it ??
Once again I am intrigued by your post. Could I get a clarification?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff  The Standard Theory (big bang) presentation of the abandoned Steady State (since the 1927 discovery of the expanding Sylpher-Hubble universe) depicts a spatially expanding universe, where the occurrence of physical systems 'thins out and dissipates with the passage of time'... |
I am reading this to say that the 'space' between two objects that are not gravitationally bound together is increasing ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff But, when the physical systems themselves are enlarging (omnidirectionally accelerating from their centers - from sub-atomic particles to everything constituted of them), then, the premise that the universe ('inevitably') 'thins out' is compromised; by the accelerating expansion of matter itself.
Yes, I mean that the density of the collective universe - the physical contents of space - (consequently) remains 'relatively' the same.. |
I'm Ok to here! Altho I think the word 'relatively' with all it's connotations could be dropped. Don't you mean 'the ratio of matter to space remains the same' ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff The physical contents of the universe were more dense in the past, than they are in - when compared with - the present, and will be less dense in the future, when compared with the present.
Whereas, there is not any greater or lesser amount of physical matter (the law of conservation of mass-energy is not infringed upon) - it's the same amount of energy, increasingly distributing itself over a greater area of space. Squared.
This is how there can be ongoing expansion (omnidirectional acceleration) in what is still an ongoing steady state universe. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff The cause of the proposed expansion of matter is no more mysterious than the (hotly debated) cause of the expansion of space; which has recently been observed to be an accelerating expansion; notably corresponding with Einstein's 'abandoned' Cosmological Constant repelling force (a previously unknown force which becomes greater with distance; quasi synonymous with the Unified Field Theory <finding electromagnetism and gravity to have the same causal identity>) - now unabashedly retrieved from 'retirement' and referred to as 'Lambda Cold Dark Matter <LCDM>'... |
1.. If the ratio remains the same how is it that we observe space expanding but not matter, underlined in above quote ?
2 .. How do you account for the agreement between the independant methods used that provide evidence for the 'standard theory's' conclusion that space is expanding ? (sorry for the convoluted sentence ... )
3.. Why haven't you posted on this subj in Roberts monthly theme ?
cool bananas ... greg