Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdWorld  *** From my point of view as a theoretical physicist this conclusion you make is somewhat elementary: my argument is that positives do attract each other as I explained in other posts as is evidenced also by the fact that protons bind together as well as atoms that are of the same [positive] electrostatic charge. |
Elementary is a very good place to start. In your theory what is the half life of proton pairs (di-protons)? The reason I ask is beause the last time I checked, di-protons were so short-lived (if they exist at all) that they don't have a published half life.
Please see: The EAS Nuclear Glue
http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/strong.htm
>Snip
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThirdWorld I said in a different place that the universe is constantly changing between positive and negative electrostatic states many times [of the order of 10^26 times] per second but that the net charge is positive. Roger |
Is there some way to falsify this?
My physics runs out of "poop" at around 10exp22 Hz. I calculate that to be the approximate orbital frequency of electrons orbiting protons to form neutrons. (Back in the 1920s it was OK to talk about nuclear electrons and I think a regression to that viewpoint is in order.)
For more on the nuclear electrons orbiting protons at about 10exp22 Hz, please see:
Neutron Beta Decay
http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/weak.htm
>Snip
Bob