Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff  It is said that the electromagnetic force reciprocating between an electron and a proton is 1039 times the gravitational force; the gravitational force between these two ‘particles’ alleged to be ‘too weak’ to be measured’ at this microcosmic level.
The nuclear force which is distinquished from gravity ‘because’ it is 1039 times stronger, is (microcosmic - 'earlier Moment A') gravity (unrecognized and unacknowledged by physicists): this is due to the (4-D continuum) fact that the value(s) of time is covariant with the moment(s) of space it (time/motion) occurs in... |
Rascal ... a small correction here .... The Nuclear Force is much stronger than the electromagnetic force so it can't also be 10^39 times stronger than gravity. (I may have misled you in an earlier post in another thread. Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff The value of a linear, square or cubic mile of space on (earlier) Moment A earth, is not the same value as that same mile measured on (later) Moment B earth, or on (latest) Moment C earth. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by RascalPuff When a motorist on Moment A earth drives his automobile at the speed he measures as 60 miles per hour, he is not traveling 60 of Moment B miles per Moment B hour...
..........................
When the ‘mini person’ inhabitant of Moment A earth may look ‘up’ along the positive (future) side of the 4th dimension of time, and see themselves at (later) Moment(s) B or C, they would see their own image as an incredibly huge, slow moving giant; if this slow moving giant of Moment A mini-person’s future could look ‘down’ along the past side of their continuously accelerating 4-D projection, they would then observe themselves as a tiny, very fast moving ‘mini-person’.
There is no way for Moment A mini-person (thinking in 3-D conceptual physics) to know that their 3 dimensions of space, and consequently their time will be relatively larger (spatially) and slower (chronologically) at (future) Moments B and C.
Conversely, there is no way for that same giant, slow moving person in (later) Moments B and C to know that the spatial dimensions and time of their entire (Moment A) universe was correspondingly more contracted in space, having proportionately smaller durations of time, at Moment A.
................
This is the reason that Einstein called ‘Space and Time’ :
Space-Time.
...........................
This is the cause of what Einstein calls ‘Non-absolute time’, and 'non-absolute space'.
.................................
It is also the cause of what Einstein calls ‘time dilation’. The value of time is determined by the value of space it occurs in. Larger moments of 4-D space result in relatively slower time, when compared with the value of time in smaller moments of 4-D space. |
This is a personal concept of Space-Time and Einstein's General theory of relativity. Don't you think you may be interpreting the math too literally. Mass and Matter are not the same. A Massive object does not have to be a giant object ?
I have my own personal concepts for this ...
I don't think it is important for concepts to agree ... just that they satisfy and allow for progress.
1 .. Twice you state that there is no way to know. Then how do you know ?
2 .. Why do you only see space as expanding, never contracting ? and vice versa for time ?
3 .. If Spacetime is pulsating everywhere in different regions, to use your words, there is no way to know ?
4 .. To put it simply, if the expansion of space, relating to your theory, was filmed and then replayed, could the Maths distinguish between the film running forward or reverse ?
cool bananas ... greg
