| Re: Omnidirectionally Expanding Matter Causes QM and the Spatially Expanding Universe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graybeard  Rascal ... a small correction here .... The Nuclear Force is much stronger than the electromagnetic force so it can't also be 10^39 times stronger than gravity. (I may have misled you in an earlier post in another thread. The figure may be 1041. Notwithstanding numbers, the point is made.
This is a personal concept of Space-Time and Einstein's General theory of relativity. Don't you think you may be interpreting the math too literally. Mass and Matter are not the same. A Massive object does not have to be a giant object ? Matter is proved to be expanding, by G.P. Thompson, and by Einstein's 4-D revelation that all matter is 4-D. I am fully aware of the similarities and differences between mass and matter, we are talking about physical size and density here.
I have my own personal concepts for this ... I don't think it is important for concepts to agree ... just that they satisfy and allow for progress.
1 .. Twice you state that there is no way to know. Then how do you know ? Yesterday's solar system was much smaller than today's. It's hours were much shorter consequently, it's miles per hour - and speed of light - were much slower when compared with those of today. This is a thought problem, and it is the means by which I reach the issued conclusions.
2 .. Why do you only see space as expanding, never contracting ? and vice versa for time ? Test objects don't 'fall' upwardly, hence the conclusion of expansion rather than contraction.
3 .. If Spacetime is pulsating everywhere in different regions, to use your words, there is no way to know ? 'Pulsating'? What do you mean by this?
4 .. To put it simply, if the expansion of space, relating to your theory, was filmed and then replayed, could the Maths distinguish between the film running forward or reverse ? The proposed accelerating expansion of matter and space is observable, only when compared with itself at earlier and later moments. Are you suggesting that it can be filmed and compared?
cool bananas ... greg  | Best regards,
- RP
__________________
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
|