Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Really no explanation necessary for your theory, RP. I've read the bulk and it's fully pinned and accepted.
Yet, to express it in such a way that it would be acceptable by the mainstream, the relationship might have to be omitted because it doesn't make sense outside of the accountability of gravity.
In other words, I think that most scientists will think in terms of measuring a mile today as compared to measuring a mile tomorrow, which will render the same result - both a mile. Then, to measure a mile comparative to the gravitational constant is to me synonymous to weighing a mile.
If I'm overlooking something, how would we calculate the difference in the measurements of the square miles? |
Well phrased, Nobody, how indeed is the difference calculated - in your presented example of square miles, for instance?
I don't do math, but I can tell you that the descent rate of objects in free fall in the absence of air resistance is 32' per " squared, and that, therefore, is the rate at which the earth expands.
Also, escape velocity is 25,000 mph. (Notably, the earth is 24 or 25,000 miles in circumference). It's entirely computable, and I can also know that the difference (from one day to the next) is impressively vast, because of the factor of exponentiality - extrapolation, we are dealing with here.
Thank you very much and sincerely. I think there's more than enough talent around here to do just that. I anticipate that such figures will reveal themselves to relate to a lot of other considerations.
Thanks again, Mr. Nobody. Sir.
- RP