Quote:
|
My physics runs out of "poop" at around 10exp22 Hz.
|
*** You are correct, I pulled the 10^26 figure out of my head but when I rechecked the text I have been consulting it does say 10^22: I really don't know where I got the 10^26 figure from.
Quote:
|
I calculate that to be the approximate orbital frequency of electrons orbiting protons to form neutrons.
|
*** I browsed through this post earlier but I didn't notice you were referring to "
electrons orbiting protons to form neutrons". This agrees with what my theory would predict as I mentioned above. At least we seem to be sitting in the same class on this one.
With respect to the frequency with which the electrostatic state of the universe changes, the figure represents the highest frequency of a gamma photon and according to my theory the fundamental particle of physics is a UNOMA which is such a gamma photon
particle at rest.
Some texts give a figure of 10^23 and upwards for the highest frequency. All matter has this fundamental frequency, the other frequencies of EMR are superimposed on this fundamental and they [the other frequencies] give the characteristics of the EMR ie visible light etc.
Finally, the orbit period of an electron must be an integral number of the fundamental frequency for electrovalent materials so you are also correct that the fundamental frequency CAN be equal to the period of orbit of an electron about a proton.
For covalent materials the electron's orbit must be an integral number of half the fundamental frequency.
Quote:
|
(Back in the 1920s it was OK to talk about nuclear electrons and I think a regression to that viewpoint is in order.)
|
*** It might be but only if neutrons are indeed neutral. I see no real logic or science in the attempts made to have a so called electrostatic balance between the nuclear charge and the electron cloud. It is actually nonsensical in my view to affirm that there is such a balance because the charge of a proton is actually over 3000 times the charge of an electron. There is therefore no need for making neutrons neutral in a theory to balance some electrostatic equation.
Having said this it will be interesting to me to find out what the relevance of this alleged electrostatic balance actually represents since indeed it seems to be related to some reality of matter that is made use of in chemistry.
Roger