[dleviwing]

Welcome to ToeQuest folla; Sorry I missed your query. I do not normally discuss beliefs and thus don't subscribe to this forum.

Originally Posted by folla rule

It is my understanding that most of science is reaction based and therefore in a simplistic way it could be argued that it is exactly the same as religious belief.... you see, whilst 'God' might remain as elusive as some scientifically accepted phenomenon the effects of that God is as measurable, via believers, as any scientific outcome...

I'm not religious but then again i'm not particularly scientific... i'm just a keen watcher

Your response is one I would expect from a novice or someone attempting to suggest science is a religion or supports the existence of a god. You are quite wrong of course. Science is a methodology requiring quantitative measurements to obtain data to support a hypothesis. If you hypothesize that there is a god then in order to make your hypothesis conform to scientific methodology you must provide experimental data to support you hypotheses; otherwise science methodology says to prove it. Religious morons however always fail to accept the difference and attempt to impose belief as part of the science methodology. There is already too much unsupported belief being promoted as science; we do not need religion to impose more dogma.

It would appear you’re not such a keen watcher either.