[neutralino]

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience neutralino, I like to first respond to the positive side of your post. Your "1." statement is positive in the way it is put forward for me to respond to. I agree, in Nature there is no thing as Singularity. In the Big Bang theory, they talk about a singularity that the Universe expanded from. That is what I think of, when I think of singularity, strictly the beginning. I would respond to this with a question. Are you saying that once a theory of gravity is found, then we may be able to work the math back to the singularity of the Big Bang?

Once we have a quantum theory of gravity then we expect there to be no singularity at the moment of the big bang; i.e. we will be able to use the theory to describe what happened then.

The first part of your "2." statement, I could agree with more. In fact, not only can I imagine the universe Being within itself, I feel the equation to set it in motion, could be: " V=4pi(-r)^3/3 " And (-r), would be a number generator starting at '0', adding 1 consecutively, into infinity.

I don't know what you mean. You seem to have some volume function, but then say ir consists of a "number generator." This makes no sense to me, since it does not describe the volume as a function of position.

Now, to all the negative parts of your post: First, there is the child like response with the roll of the eyes.

It's hardly child-like. You say in your post that your threads get people commenting on them with "nothing new"and that these people are "unthinking realists." Well, I have introduced nothing new to your post, and thus I must fall into this category of person!