[neutralino]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY

It is a test, neutralino, to see if you are willing to think outside the box so to speak. You are apparently very intelligent, but to conform to consensus won't make you like Einstein which is what I am looking for, another Einstein.

I don't want to be the next Einstein: I'm just starting out in my career and would like a job! Besides, upto now, you've not given me anything to think outside of the box with!

The particles would annihilate, continually, the electrons would fall into the nuclei repeatedly, yes, but the annihilation would produce photons which collide with absorbed photons to create new particle pairs, as per the repeatable experiments performed at SLAC, and as per their hypothesized kinetic energy model, the high-energy gamma bursts would explain the masses of the unnecessary W-Z bosons.

I can't comment on this, as I'm not a particle physicist. However, this scenario seems to me to be rather unstable whereas we know that protons are stable particles. Still, my point with respect to the overall charge of the nucleus still holds