Quote:
Originally Posted by baudrunner  As I see it, the only force that drives the idea of the existence of a mysterious dark matter or dark energy is the erroneous presumption that all the matter in the Universe was created by a Big Bang.
How does the math look if we presume something else? For example, if we presume that creation continues at the periphery of the Universe, with its event horizon expanding as a matter of course as the space that is created increases perpetually in volume? |
Dark matter is a misinterpretation of the galaxies' velocity curve.
Because.
Scientists have misinterpreted the orbital velocity as angular velocity.
If you understand that a galaxy's two arms are in balance, you understand that you shall use only the half of Newton's gravity equation when you calculating.
And you find that:
The forces in Newton's gravity equation and in the centripetal equation are in equilibrium.
Consequently:
No dark matter is needed to explain the rotation curve.
No dark energy is needed because there is no expansion of the universe.
The expansion of universe is a misinterpretation of the galaxies' radiation that is displaced (redshifted spectral-lines) by the entropy-effect towards equilibrium.
That entropy-displacement implies acceleration of the radiation.
The same entropy-law is behind hydrodnamics, electrodynamics (light), and air-dynamics (sound), but by different and specific constants.
See the interesting pictures, experiments and mathematical derivations at my webb-site:
http://www.theuniphysics.info
Ingvar, Sweden
See also the interesting result at google by the key-words:
theory +physics