[neutralino]

Originally Posted by N0B0DY

Neutralino,

With respect to your knowledge, the outside-the-box thinking includes consideration of the SLAC interpretation of subatomic masses linking to shadow gravity, the elimination of the need for quarks, squarks and eventually even leptons and differential bosons. Though we can keep positrons, electrons and photons for the time being, maybe call it "PEP Theory."

Do you have any references on this "SLAC Theory"? What happens to the neutrinos we have observed? What are they if you discard all the leptons?

You're right, the proton is considered stable, but if it were to continually annihilate with an antiproton, it would be considered very short-lived.

But then, so would any particle if there was lots of antimatter around! The fact is that there is not.

Also, call it a g.u.t. feeling, but I think many individuals underestimate RascalPuff. He has put alot of time in developing a great theory that is complimentary to many ideas we may have. No one is asking anyone to swallow things whole, but to fairly give things and ideas a bit of time to sink in before we share our inferences.

Please, let's not bring it into this thread too. There's already far too many threads discussing his "theory" on this website.