Originally Posted by neutralino  Hi Pat,
I've had another look at your idea since I've got a few minutes free, in an attempt to try and understand it and, if possible, make any constructive comment! However, there are a few things I don't understand about your idea (some of them are fundamental things I believe!).
On the page entitles "Creation's first partial second" you show how dimensions are formed. My problems come in dimension 3, volume and the venn diagram on the next page (which I think is fundamental to your theory). Yes it is, in fact it would be my theory on a T shirt.
1.How does the Venn diagram relate to a particle. For example, how would I "see" a proton on that page?The whole Venn Diagram is the proton, not just the center. Together they is a net + charge. I know you say that it's in the very centre, since it has positive charge (what I think you represent with ___ and negative as - - -), but why?The I Ching represents ___ as male, and - - as female. If you look at say area #4 ( the BLUE area }You'll see 1 convex curve ___ and 2 concave curves - -. Multiplying pos x neg x neg = positive ( or a positive area ) Remember this is in total agreement with the mathematical octants on the following page. Also the 3 outside Primary colors, are the I Ching sons and the 3 inner colors are the secondary or complementary colors are the I Ching daughters ( coincidence? )
2. How do quarks fit into this picture? You state on the first page there are "3 quarks" but where do they come into play? Or, are the three quarks the three colors R,G,B? Yes. Those would be the 3 quarks.(I know that the standard model tells us there are 8 quarks, but if you decide to only consider protons neutrons and electrons, then I suppose you can only use three).Yes. I am only dealing with 3 quarks here, and discussing only the Proton/electron Neutron. ( This is an Idea in progress, and I realize there are many subatomic particles not addressed here, and your area of interest gravity not addressed.
3. The electron is a "projection from the proton." How does this projection work? If all particles are members of some set of the "inner sanctum," how can one of the most fundamental ones not be? Well it is and it isn't. I believe it was Dirac who had a theory of negative space. Additionally I think I read that electrons can be viewed as point particles anywhere in space. And so when the proton projects its beam, it manisfest the electron, which than becomes a ripple or field in space. ( This is why I think the electron can be viewed as both a point particle and also as a " cloud ". Further I think this explains the remarkable coincidence that for every proton there just happens to be an electron to 10 to the 80th power. Quite a coincidence.)When the proton is enfolded in a spherical shape all positive and negative areas are balanced.
4. Then, there's the question of how do particles interact; which forces do you still have in your model? It appears to be only the color force; do all particles interact under this? I guess this question can be left until I understand the above ones.Actually that is the force Gell-Mann and others proposed. I have no trouble with that but actually I think it's are old familiar EMR in operation here. Positive and Negative charges or areas.
That's all for now. Hopefully I'll be able to better understand your idea if I understand how these questions are answered. |