| 2 betas 1 real -
11-16-2007, 12:22 PM
Cosmological theories cannot explain the unmixing of matter and antimatter by accepting numerous experimental proofs of quantum mechanics that matter and antimatter were created equally, simultaneously at the infinitesimal localized space-time region of the big bang. Moreover, for that matter, no cosmological theories can explain why a universal favoritism or bias exists in favor of matter and discriminating antimatter by denying its right to exist. Furthermore, cosmologists were completely dumbstruck by the suggestion that some distant galaxies millions of lightyears away might be made entirely of antimatter even without the observed gamma outburst. On the other hand, high energy physics provides ample evidence that there are two distinct beta decay processes which should be perfectly symmetrical at high energy but broken at low energy. The first is where and when a proton decays into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino: P ® N + e+ +n. The second is where and when a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino: N ® P + e- + n-. These are both mediated by weak nuclear force or at high temperature and energy appropriately by the electroweak force. However, at low energy, only the second nuclear disintegration is really observed and the process is completed within 15 minutes while the first could never happen even if the wait is a thousand quadrillions quadrillions years. In terms of space-time charges, the first gives a hydrogen configuration of (16, 16) while the helium configuration of (46, 46) and (16, 16) + (46, 46) = (62, 62). This upheld the principle of even number conservation. The second gives (12, 12) for hydrogen and (50, 50) for helium and again (12, 12) + (50, 50) = (62, 62) preserving total even number conservation. But in order to agree with the abundance ratio of 3 to 1, the first must borrow energy from the vacuum while the second only need to release internal energy. In light of the experimental impossibility of the first process, it is logical to surmise that nature refuses to lend its energy in order to conserve its uniformity. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² |