Quote:
Originally Posted by dipayankar  Fredrick,
In a mutually exclusive system, there is only one right. I refuse to believe in God or Religion because it is opposed to logic on which science stands. Show me one piece of logic in religion.. whatever good is written in the gospels do not need a God. It is inherent in a man's mind to do good.
As far is calling us religious, I am just pitting my thoughts against your thoughts. |
Dipiyankar,
You did not get the essence of what I am saying. I am saying that science is not a singular system itself. Science contains the conflict already, and if you believe that is not the case, well then you are a believer, because the ultimate evidence is not in your hands. You would then indeed be a believer in a scientific platform of unification; that science and only science will bring the ultimate answers. I repeat; the final answers can be given by science, but they must be of such a nature that at the same time the other deliveries (of philosophical and in some cases of religious nature) can maintain their own positions as well.
I am not talking about god in opposition to science; that's why I found Lloyd's word amusing already to begin with. Don't turn the table on me when I state you to be believers of science as the singular ultimate entity and make me then all of a sudden the
believer of the anti-science or whatever.
You need to re-read the discussion and get back to what this discussion is about, Dipiyankar. Your replies are missing the point.