But where is the truth? Is it that classical science and quantum science compliment each other? They certainly are right at their own places. Probably bridging the gap is what we call the TOE....
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  I don't think there would be such a concept as permanence in that case, Dip. Quantum mechanics essentially destroyed any future grasp of what classical physics has to offer. Like m theory, we can either form our model based on classical models or on quantum functioning. M theory leans toward the former to keep the laws the same, I lean toward the latter to keep the laws the same according to my own interpretations. There can be no "truth" that people can tell us other than what we are willing to believe. |