[N0B0DY]

I know you know what you're talking about, but I don't think you know what I'm talking about. I paid attention to your uniform motion, but I equate that motion to absolute non-motion. I also equate that non-motion to matter, which is different than mass/energy and therefore it would have nothing to do with the conversion of negative mass (which is positive energy or radiation pressure) into positive mass (which is negative energy or gravity).

To a mainstream scientist it is foolish, I agree, but perhaps not to one aiming at keeping universal symmetry.

So there's no need to flash our doctorates, Dave. This isn't rocket science. I'm merely expressing my picture of the puzzle.

To picture it another way, consider a cumulative Casimir Effect as the cause of the gravitational effect and quantum chemistry based on the Huygens Principle.