[dipayankar]

Nobody, why do I feel that you are tending towards string theory with this post. Your second paragraph aligns itself with string theory..

Originally Posted by N0B0DY

Dip,

I lean more to quantum mechanics than to classical mechanics, based on my interpretation of motion. It is natural and common to think in terms of, say, your hand moving from one point to another instead of being incrementally recreated over space-time increments according to mass and acceleration. Time being the sole factor in creating phenomena, whereas in the "reality" from the perspective of the universe, your hand is created minus the propagation. This can be further taken throughout the scales of what your hand consists of, but I'm sure you would want to leave that to your imagination.

I think the cumulative effects of quantum gravity produce the macroscopic effects through atomic alignment. Similar to the atomic alignment producing disc-shaped molecules. Variable alignments cause the variable effects required for the whole universe to function as it does.

I remember someone once mentioning to me that atoms with short half lives are disc-shaped as well, and atoms with longer half lives are spherical. Perhaps there is a correlation between that phenomenon and galaxy formations with variable shapes due to age.

Ultimately I think the scale you mention, neutralino, plays an important role in how things are observed. If there is a correlation between gravitational time dilation and gravitational mass, and the stability of atoms is due to the time it takes for light to traverse upscale, I think the gap can be permanently closed.