Nobody, I'm all ears, if you can propose a "fundamental formal framework of understanding", that's both compatible to science logic, and metaphyics/abstraction... So, what's this fundamental abstract formal framework, you allude to...? IMO, it would have to be recognition of a "first fundamental dual set of formal laws", and their integrated functioning, as I have so clearly mentioned, in many threads, in the past. I long ago mentioned this to Guille... What do you say...?
I further agree, we could theorize that a photon is most likely, the most fundamental particle/wave, since all known matter decay, seems to decay into photons, and start basing all gravity mechanics and metaphysics, on this one fundamental idea, but then, that takes considerable debate and agreement, and yet un-realized physical and mathematical proof...
Lloyd
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  I was going to post how brane waves and brain waves are related to, created by, the center of gravity, but we would first have to allow abstract explanations of gravity and wave mechanics in order to expound upon our scientific understanding.
As it stands, everything in science is in parts and there are so many interpretations of these parts, that everyone in the scientific community is already basing their reality on what is thought to be true - if even by a large consensus, doesn't make it right and true.
We might revert to the following, and perhaps put things together in a different fashion to draw our own conclusions as to what is the "whole picture," as Fredrick might say.
"We may agree, perhaps, to understand by Metaphysics an attempt to know reality as against mere appearance, or the study of first principles or ultimate truths, or again the effort to comprehend the universe, not simply piecemeal or by fragments, but somehow as a whole." - Bradley, 1846-1924 |