[humanbydefault]

I'm sorry I couldn't find time to sit in front of a computer and respond to your comments about the subject.

Thank you for your opinion and I'll give you another reason why I believe Einstein's General Relativity is based on a wrong approach:

Is there a book or a serious scientific document holding the last word on the EXACT MEASUREMENT OF "c"...?

NON! It's is obvious from my point of view... Think about it for a second.

Einstein thought that the Speed of Light was a constant across the entire universe. I disagree with his argument 100%. I personally believe [with all due respect for his genius] that the only constant in the entire universe is the SHIFT BETWEEN THE SO-CALLED "ELECTRICAL FIELD" AND "MAGNETIC FIELD" OF ANY ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE IN THE UNIVERSE.

Now! It may sound that I'm contradicting myself once again but I'm not. Assuming that the "SPATIAL SHIFT" (I'd preferred to call it this way) is exactly the same NO MATTER THE FREQUENCY -or what's the same to say- or its "WAVELENGTH"...

... Would be the 3 dimensional SPACE [in the macroworld] the same when the length of the wave changes?

You must visualize the picture in your mind and be honest with yourself. The answwer would definitely be: NO!

The higher the frequency, the shorter its wavelength and THEREFORE... THE SHORTER THE SPACE COVERED by the same wave at a given TIME (!)

THAT'S THE REASON EVERY SCIENTIFIC TEAM TRYING TO MEASURE THE EXACT [precise] SPEED OF LIGHT WILL COME WITH DIFFERENT NUMBERS EVERY TIME.

I'll add another tip to those interested in knowing what I'm trying to deliver here:

IF indeed "c" [the so-called speed of light] were always the same -no matter the frequency or wavelength of a given wave of electromagnetic energy- ATOMS COULDN'T BOND TO EACH OTHER AND MATTER [THE WAY WE KNOW IT] WOULDN'T EXIST IN THIS UNIVERSE.

Think about this for a second! Some atoms are bigger than others and therefore the "inter-atomic distance" needed to be covered by the outer "electrons" would be different in every case... however we observe the combination of molecules and atoms of all kind of sizes [water is a perfect example] withour any inconsistency in the integrity of its physical existence.

Chemical bonds are as stable as the reality we observe every single moment and this is due to a phenomenon of sinchronism during the "RESONANCE" OF THE ENERGY WAVES BETWEEN DIMENSIONS making the "SHIFT" (between the electrical field and the magnetic field) ALWAYS CONSTANT ACROSS THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE.

ALL WE KNOW ... OR MUST OF WHAT WE ASSUME WE KNOW ABOUT THE UNIVERSE HAS BEEN BASED ON A WRONG ASSUMPTION ALL THIS TIME... of course, that is just my humble opinion about this subject.


WHAT'S YOURS?

HBD