Fredrick, you must think people are quite ignorant, to believe such non-sense, especially one like myself, since I don't believe___Period. Show me the proofs, or be silent... You've shown nothing, factual, yet... You just keep rambling on about your own self-dellusions... Start from the physical substance level, and show us what you're talking about, or you have absolutely nothing, as all reality absolutely requires___Physical Substance___First... Mathematics of, is always secondary... I see no-where, in the entire history of ideas, where math created anything, except larger retro-egos...
Lloyd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrick  Lloyd, please address the mathematical evidence I deliver, not the circumstantial words and numbers I use to explain my further thoughts. If you do not address the fundamental parts first then the circumstantial aspects (that automatically must contain contradictory information) are of no use.
Remember, my mathematical delivery belongs to the general level, the level where we expect the toe to be formulated.[No___Where you expect it to be formulated, and think it will be, not I...] Except for helping understand the overall image, my mathematical delivery helps only somewhat in explaining the detailed level, for all details exist within their own specific contexts.[Truth and proofs, are only in the scientific details___The whole needs no truth or proof, we see it, and we know it___It is...] This delivery helps us to understand the context of all contexts.[The last to think that egoistically big, were Russell and Whitehead___They were wrong. No-one has yet been able to unite higher order logic, with higher order math. I kinda doubt you will, either. IMO, it's not mathematically possible, to figure the universe's aggregate matter/wave motions. So, the understanding of the universe's actions, must come from the a-priori logic circuits, and their associated progressive-cognitive databases of knowledge accumulations and acquisitions, or in simple terms___the parts... Gravity would be a good place to start___Explain it...]
Where Nobody has a delivery wrapped in itself (true when declared true), my delivery contains this mathematical information on which we can stand. I am not asking you to believe in that information; it exists with or without you or me acknowledging it, believing it, or discarding it. It simply is. |
"It simply is." How big is your retro-ego anyway, Fredrick...? Show the physical proofs, of logic's relations to math, because, so far, you're only seducing yourself, with more senseless wordplay...
Lloyd