Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  Sorry, I don't understand enough E8 math to agree or not. But it looks impressive. What I really wanted is to make fusion possible, cold or hot doesn't matter. |
Yes Antonio, cold fusion is one of my dreams also. A physicist friend of mine mentioned to me that, somehow removing electrons in certain mixtures or structures would do it, but I don't know of any way to remove, just the electrons, do you...? And then, I don't know if that may work, either...? They're what seems to be stopping the fusion, at least until we get enough of them moving, in nuclear reactors, etc...
As to hot fusion, as in the first star/black hole, it may have been cold fusion first, leading to hot fusion. At least, it's another possibility, since the universe must have first been cold... So I've been trying to theorize the cold fusion side of the equation, from primal universal conditions. So far, to me anyway, gravity is not an attractive force, at all___it's a repulsive force, the force of aggregate hydrodynamics of black-hole mass-entropy cycles. IMO, there is nothing in the universe that attracts, even magnetism repulses. The repulsion of aggregate em waves, through spiraling, chiraling, precessing paths, pass from magnet source and slow in c velocity, to -c velocity upon re-entry, thus have mass expanding size, thus increasing the hydrodynamic effect on re-entry, as opposed to exiting the source magnet. I see gravity working the same way, as just another velocity loss of exiting em-waves from source matter. DSR(Doubly Special Relativity), which I prefer to call Deep Special Relativity, is heading in this direction also. I think we may be able to prove some of these ideas, by measuring the true c velocity of incoming Gamma-rays, verses the outgoing em-waves' differences of true c and -c velocities. Most have said you can't measure the difference, but my theorizing tells me we can, by first realizing what must be filtered, by our more accurate instruments of today, as verses the past. If DSR is proved to be true, as these very experiments are, at present, being set up by members of the Parimeter Institute, in Canada, then we have a whole new ball game set in play. I await the results.
As a clarification of what I wrote above, if em-waves leave a source faster than re-entry, the mass-energy is greater, yet smaller in size, thus having less hydrodynamic footprint, on the aggregate em-wave field, it's passing through, yet if slowing on re-entry, has a larger hydrodynamic footprint, on the aggregate em-wave field, thus accounting for both magnetism's forces and gravity's forces. If true, then all universal gravity is, is the hydrodynamic differences of aggregate mass velocities' source changes, over exit and re-entry velocities, verses the aggregate presence of all em-waves, in its re-entry paths...
Of course, this is only theory, at present, but the pieces all seem to fit, so far... At first I couldn't figure the thermal factors verses the hydrodynamic factors, until I realized the hydrodynamic mass velocity factors outweigh the thermal factors on exit, as velocity increases at source, and the mass expansion factors outweigh the thermal factors of slowing re-entry dynamics... The theory works for me, and also explains all initial conditions of finite formations of matter from a fundamental substance, which I think would have to be photons, since that's all that present matter finally decays into... I am also still awaiting the proton decay, the standard model predicts, as I think it must also someday, decay... See what you think...
Regards,
Lloyd