Theory of Everything - View Single Post

humanbydefault · **"e T E R N A L R E F L E X I O N S" -** 12-05-2007, 11:04 AM

Last night I was watching the HISTORY CHANNEL [a thing that I often do if I find it interesting to watch...] and I catched a film about the birth of planets. Cosmologists can't explain -even as we speak- how big (also called jupiter-like) planets or hot-gas giants could spin so close and at such huge velocities around a star. If the concept of GRAVITY were understood I guess non of those questions were really a problem for us, but the truth is that GRAVITY and along with it so many other concepts like EATHER and many more become more and more enigmatic as we look into farther regions of the cosmos.

Acording to the way cosmologists are tryng to explain how planets attach themselves into an eliptical orbit around their sun at such incredible short distances from the star nothing make great sense anymore... don't take my word for granted... go and see for yourselves if you don't believe me.

My point is simple: If what makes the spatial planetarium orbit around a given sun were depended ONLY on the mass of the star those incredible phenomena [seen many times in different star systems] wouldn't be taking place at all... BUT THEY ARE A REALITY AND THEREFORE WE MUST ADMIT THAT WE HAVE TO BE WRONG.

Remember that Einstein proposed in his theory of relativity that planets orbit stars because of the effect produced by their big mass on the fabric of space-time. I agree on the consequence mentioned by him on the topography of space-time but not about the simplistic concept of MASS as the only factor involved.

I think that stars act just like the nucleus of atoms given their high content of energy. I believe that the energy spinning inside the nucleus of those suns are the ones responsible for the shape of the orbit followed by incoming planets and other space bodies attracted by it.

If the actual energy of the sun AND NOT ITS MASS were the only cause of the curvature on the fabric of space-time then those huge planets could be explained by the pull of high energy stars and not by the size or length of their mass.

HUMANBYDEFAULT

	(#1 (permalink))
humanbydefault 2nd degree Black Belt Status: Offline Posts: 328 Thanks Given: 2 Thanked 18x in 14 Posts Join Date: Jun 2005 Rep Power: 16	"e T E R N A L R E F L E X I O N S" - 12-05-2007, 11:04 AM Last night I was watching the HISTORY CHANNEL [a thing that I often do if I find it interesting to watch...] and I catched a film about the birth of planets. Cosmologists can't explain -even as we speak- how big (also called jupiter-like) planets or hot-gas giants could spin so close and at such huge velocities around a star. If the concept of GRAVITY were understood I guess non of those questions were really a problem for us, but the truth is that GRAVITY and along with it so many other concepts like EATHER and many more become more and more enigmatic as we look into farther regions of the cosmos. Acording to the way cosmologists are tryng to explain how planets attach themselves into an eliptical orbit around their sun at such incredible short distances from the star nothing make great sense anymore... don't take my word for granted... go and see for yourselves if you don't believe me. My point is simple: If what makes the spatial planetarium orbit around a given sun were depended ONLY on the mass of the star those incredible phenomena [seen many times in different star systems] wouldn't be taking place at all... BUT THEY ARE A REALITY AND THEREFORE WE MUST ADMIT THAT WE HAVE TO BE WRONG. Remember that Einstein proposed in his theory of relativity that planets orbit stars because of the effect produced by their big mass on the fabric of space-time. I agree on the consequence mentioned by him on the topography of space-time but not about the simplistic concept of MASS as the only factor involved. I think that stars act just like the nucleus of atoms given their high content of energy. I believe that the energy spinning inside the nucleus of those suns are the ones responsible for the shape of the orbit followed by incoming planets and other space bodies attracted by it. If the actual energy of the sun AND NOT ITS MASS were the only cause of the curvature on the fabric of space-time then those huge planets could be explained by the pull of high energy stars and not by the size or length of their mass. HUMANBYDEFAULT

The Following User Says Thank You to humanbydefault For This Useful Post:
MJA (12-05-2007)