Quote:
Originally Posted by Graybeard  Wow ... now that you say that ... I am unsure ... But I think, and only think, that the 'redshift' of the reflection would also have to match the 'redshift' of the receding mirror. If it doesn't, but is twice 'redshifted' in relation to the mirror ... then POK is back in the running with his idea. !!!
It would also mean, a really bizarre thought, that red-shifted light reflected from objects in space could be supplying information that is incorrect regarding the objects themselves ... for this reason alone I am convinced that it is incorrect ... but at this exact moment, for the life of me, I can't see why ????
You've raised a good point Nob, if I understand you correctly.
Perhaps Neutralino, or Dave or Lloyd could work this out ... I am thinking but nothing is coming yet ... LOL
cool bananas ... greg  |
I'm with you Greg, I also think red-blue-shifted light
"reflected from objects in space could be supplying information that is incorrect regarding the objects themselves". That is why I have chosen to use the atomic decay model, to interpret the truer motions of objects in space. Of course, I mainly use it as a corrective knowledge tool, applied to red-blue-shifted light. To me, there's just far too much gravitational lensing, between us, and distant objects, to fully rely on the total accuracy of our instruments, even when most of the filters are applied. I haven't seen anywhere, where someone else is using atomic decay mechanics, as a filter of gravitational lensing. They may be, but I'm not aware of it...
Regards,
Lloyd