View Single Post
Re: "redshift" A Different Approach
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Graybeard
8th degree Black Belt
Graybeard is a splendid one to beholdGraybeard is a splendid one to beholdGraybeard is a splendid one to beholdGraybeard is a splendid one to beholdGraybeard is a splendid one to behold
 
Graybeard's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,304
Thanks Given: 558
Thanked 450x in 278 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 35
   
Re: "redshift" A Different Approach - 12-06-2007, 06:05 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbydefault View Post
The higher the frequency, the shorter its wavelength and THEREFORE... THE SHORTER THE SPACE COVERED by the same wave at a given TIME (!)
I don't understand the THEREFORE .... Higher frequencies do mean shorter wavelengths but more of them travel in the same space ??

25000Hz or 50000Hz per second means that the wave alters its amplitude either 25000 times per second .... Long waves ... or 50000 times per second ... shorter waves. But the wave, at whatever frequency still travels the same distance in one 1 second ...

Otherwise FM radio would not work ... different frequency shifts (FM = Frequency Modulation) would cause garbage on your receiver ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbydefault View Post
He (Einstein) said that GRAVITY caused the pull necessary for the "miracle" and I say that he should have said that "the different density of the eather close to the star" was the one causing the change in the path of the light.
Actually, I think this is what he did say, that it caused an easier path through spacetime. Analgous to your thinner aether.

Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbydefault View Post
I don't see other explanation for the fact that instead of receiving a full range of frequencies any star is capable of emitting, we only get the infrared instead.
I may not be correct here, but we do receive the FULL range of frequencies. The colours we interpret are simply frequencies. Longer wavelengths we interpret as Red. Shorter as Blue.

We don't receive ONLY infrared, but as all the frequencies are 'stretched' the same as in the receding Doppler shift for sound waves, then they appear to us as 'more Red-ish' than they would to someone from whom the distant source is not receding. But they are still the same waves!!

If you are in a really super-fast car, something capable of pulling close to 'c', then as you approach a 'red' light it will, from your view, appear green (doppler shift towards blue).

You will lose your case in court for speeding, but you will win your case for stating that the light was green. If we are ever to legally drive vehicles near 'c' speed ... all the traffic lights will have to be replaced with lights of longer (infra-infra-red ) wavelengths in order to account for the doppler shift. LOL


my thoughts only, you did invite input

cool bananas ... greg


'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.
  
Reply With Quote