View Single Post
neutralino
Master

neutralino's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 747
13 neutralino has a spectacular aura about

Awards Showcase
1st Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1

Quote  
12-06-2007, 07:53 AM
Re: "redshift" A Different Approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbydefault View Post
Einstein thought that the Speed of Light was a constant across the entire universe. I disagree with his argument 100%. I personally believe [with all due respect for his genius] that the only constant in the entire universe is the SHIFT BETWEEN THE SO-CALLED "ELECTRICAL FIELD" AND "MAGNETIC FIELD" OF ANY ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE IN THE UNIVERSE.
So what about hbar and G, the other fundamental constants? Are these constants? Can you define your new supposed constant more clearly please (i.e. mathematically).

Quote:
IF indeed "c" [the so-called speed of light] were always the same -no matter the frequency or wavelength of a given wave of electromagnetic energy- ATOMS COULDN'T BOND TO EACH OTHER AND MATTER [THE WAY WE KNOW IT] WOULDN'T EXIST IN THIS UNIVERSE.

Think about this for a second! Some atoms are bigger than others and therefore the "inter-atomic distance" needed to be covered by the outer "electrons" would be different in every case... however we observe the combination of molecules and atoms of all kind of sizes [water is a perfect example] withour any inconsistency in the integrity of its physical existence.
Now, I'm normally willing to let things go on here, but can you please give me proof of this? It seems like you still think of the model of an atom as electrons orbitting a nucleus, which is a shame for someone who is questioning the fundamentals of quantum mechanics!
__________________
~neutralino

If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.
Reply With Quote
neutralino is offlineReport Post
 
Ringtones | Electricity Suppliers | Loan | Loans | Mortgages