Master
Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 752
28  | |
12-06-2007, 01:35 PM
| | Re: The Three Theory
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie  Fredrick, you must think people are quite ignorant, to believe such non-sense, especially one like myself, since I don't believe___Period. Show me the proofs, or be silent... You've shown nothing, factual, yet... You just keep rambling on about your own self-dellusions... Start from the physical substance level, and show us what you're talking about, or you have absolutely nothing, as all reality absolutely requires___Physical Substance___First... Mathematics of, is always secondary... I see no-where, in the entire history of ideas, where math created anything, except larger retro-egos...
Lloyd
"It simply is." How big is your retro-ego anyway, Fredrick...? Show the physical proofs, of logic's relations to math, because, so far, you're only seducing yourself, with more senseless wordplay...
Lloyd | It looks like you do not want to talk basic math, Lloyd. I've shown you the evidence at http://www.pentapublishing.com/Math.html and you don't want to communicate about that. That's your choice. All I can say is that I will not follow you in stating that math is secondary in light of a toe; as math has done many times, it helps our understanding.
__________________
The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not. | |
| |