Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Nice of you to drop in, Greg. I was going to respond to your new thread, but noticed it was for private members only - o(-_-)o - so I thought I might make a few comments about it here. I'll be damned if it doesn't make my thread look tame! Seriously, though, it's very well versed and I don't want to mess it up if you're looking to go in another direction.
Like Drifter and Pat have extensively covered, the present moment seems to be made up of those past-future parts with, I would propose, all baseball games already been played, but the slow mind hasn't realized it yet being stretched into the past for processing - the time dilation you referred to.
I don't think the frozen moments, if speaking or thinking in absolute terms, can exist outside of the dimensional extension, which is why I propose all observable phenomena is governed by time, including space. Though the picture itself could be related to massive entities frozen in time, their intrinsic quantities and color qualities would be dependent upon inner motion, and without such motion there would be no static picture to view.
I always have Lloyd's contractive mechanics in the back of my head, as well as Dave's universal laws, and my sole/soul goal is to convey at least semi-accurately the non existence of photons. |
.............................