Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  The way I correlate it all so far is through time, with time zero as unconsciousness, the absolute center of "being," if you will; the subconscious functioning of the brain sets the parameters by breaking time into infinitesimal quanta, both forward and backward as time. Needless to say, this type of time is illusory or unobservable; finally, the finite reality that is observed four-dimensionally consists of consciously gluing the above increments together in discrete perceptible measures at the CPU rate of c. We can invoke the use of gluons here, if you wish.
The correlation between subconscious parameters and subatomic particles is through the interactions of the short-lived virtual particles, whereby their superluminal velocities dilate time from zero to eternity, part of which(the part observed) is in the form of stabilized atoms. So the reason we would observe anything in motion, like the moving arms you mentioned, is because the energy transfers of the atoms are being recreated incrementally over the time it takes the frames to be traversed by light - sort of like the motion-picture hypothesis, but with the added note that the static frame(newtonian spacetime) cannot exist without internal time dilation. There would be no extension possible or colors possible for us to see.
As an aside, my atomic model is based on electrons and positrons, continually annihilating over cyclical atomic orbits. Each cycle equals new particle pairs.
You're right about the brain. The absolute center - T-zero point - could be classified as brain dead, which I advocate as being a necessary transition for a new type of thinking. |
Nob ... I am sure what your saying has merit. But you write as though I am familar with the terms. I do get the gist of what your saying (I think)
What is superluminal ... ?
How do you practically view a relationship between subconscious parameters and subatomic particles ?
I know that you see this, but you left me back on the starting line ... LOL
I don't know if our brains can operate at the rate of 'c' .. presuming they could ... why 'c' ?
cool bananas ... greg
