[neutralino]

Originally Posted by purveyor of knowledge

Now as you were saying, the definition of everything is that nothing is greater than everything.

Actually, the first post introduced an axiom that said nothing>everything. However, that is not a definition of the object "everything"; it is a definition of the relationship between the two objects "nothing" and "everything." The statement that you make, and the statement that kj makes are not the same.

Originally Posted by pok

0<1/0<0
1/0=1/0
0 does not equal

this means that nothing is greater than or less than everything. Everything is everything, nothing more or less. Zero does not equal anything. What do you think?

This is just a statement of a weird number system in which the operation "=" is not properly defined.

Also, whilst I understand that your ideas are closely related to this topic, let's remember that this thread was started by kj for kj's topic, and so please let him/her discuss this instead of overly advertising your theory. I'm not saying that you have done anything wrong, but just wanted to mention that to enable you to consider it in your replying posts.