[N0B0DY]

Greg,

The processes you mentioned are related to the media I mentioned, so the correlation is exactly proportionate in all instances; the vacuum is also the opposite of what is commonly thought of as empty, but absolutely full - without any holes or space; and this latter reference implies that if there is no space, then the source of the signal and destination are the same point in spacetime. Similar to what Pat brought up about inflation of space, though allegedly expanding into time, there is no dimensional existence for a literal inflation and is the reason I infer it is an impossibility - it can't expand into that which isn't there. So the point before the big bang can't very well have changed in the slightest. Yet because this point is equal to two absolute states, it is both absolutely expanded and contracted simultaneously, allowing for an infinite number of relative velocities and densities to result as abstractions (existing in no particular place and time) within the absolute states. (Not meant to be pondered without first notifying you physician.)

The second part is right on because absolute fullness would equate to the "fully present" or omnipresent, and a reduction of which results in forward and backward perceptions of time. Yet the fullness, in the absolute sense, is synonymous to vacuity. Both states are the same impenetrable state - nothing can go through it, and nothing doesn't exist.

The last part is inferred to be an impossible state of existence, so I noted "what would be the absolute perspective." to imply that when the past, present and future are absolutely unified time doesn't exist - is unobservable because observation is dependent upon differential factors. Perhaps to consider it more clearly we can imagine light or space as representing time, and the absolute as the state that would exist when space is either reduced to zero or expanded to one impossible whole.