[sillysally]

This is a really neat idea. But I have some questions. What about a person that has a mental disability and commit some of the worst crimes against humanity? Can they be held accountable? Or what if it was a part of a persons culture to commit a crime such as capital punishment, that person putting the other to death feels like they are doing society a favor. There are only 2 countries in this world that I am aware that there is no death sentence, Israel and Macedonia. In the US, would the judge or whoever it is that passes that law that makes it ok to kill criminals, or the people that voted that person in office, guilty as well? I know you say that there are less sin crimes but I see a lot of people guilty by association, voters for one. If something like what you say is a possibility, I don't think that sins are unequal, I think the only way to judge that would be to weigh the persons heart and to know if they are really repented. That wouldn't be recorded outside of the persons feelings most time.

I think for this to be true, the reigns need to be tighter and all sin to be weighed equally. For anyone to say lying is a lesser sin than killing is only trying to justify, too many people are going to make their own sin less than equal to other sins. Do you see what I mean? We can't say this is ok but that isn't ok, so it's good to have an outside, non biased view such as the all seeing God thing.