[Casey_deJong]

The question of weather time is a seperate entity is a dificult question to answer. But like most dificult question it has a simple answer.

Before the universe was born time existed. Time itself dosent move though
it is as static as we percieve space to be.
if in the begining time existed and we presume space did also then they must be the parents as it were of the universe

But how from the emptiness of space and the static nature of time did we get a singularity to triger the big bang?

If you believe in god it is easy to say that he merged the two. But that dose still leave the question of where he came from.

I used to think that time was always moving and affected us all in the same way at the same time. but it seems now more reasonable to think of time as a giant cell which the universe lives within maybe cell isnt the right word. prehaps singularity is more fitting. a giant singularity which is static bu gasius or even liquid in the way we move through it.

if time was a singularity then it is possible that space also may have been a singularity

if god as people believe is perfection then it is possible that he was born from the two perfect singularities of time and space.
a child we define as the space time continuim??

if the space and time singularities peaked in perfect harmony then harmonic vibrations would have become pure energy. the orgasm of the universe the Big bang. Harmonics would have been the only way to fuse time and space into a new singularity the space-time continuim

Space and time have different properties though and lucky for us that is the case. otherwise the space time continuim would have become a solid ball of matter. (i say ball because in my mind i view the univese as a sphere somewhat like a raindrop.) as it turned out the diferencess between the two singularties made it so that where they harmonised energy formed and thus through energy matter was born.

belief in god helps now in explaining how the energy was manipulated into stars planets and galaxies. but if you don't believe in god then gravity is the most typical answer for why the universe looks as it dose

the energy being newly born matter as it coolled became heavy. The theory of general relativity explains why the galaxies cluster as they do due to gravity. but not why they move away from each other.

this tho is due to the static nature of time. light being the direct result of energy is similar to the thrust on a jet engine. tho a jet engine is directional and the light from a galaxy is spread in all directions but because all galaxies emit light or thrust the push away from each other is stronger than the gravity and the thrust towards each other. the thrust of a galaxy through static time is similar to the jet engine through our atmosphere.

but all things will still age at relativly the same time. right?
But wait if im no mistaken it dosent dose it. If you have a watch and i have a watch syncronised then one of us goes on a journey they lose syncronisatin don't they. so whats relative. Relativly especially on this planet because the planet is travelling through time and we are all on it.

What if we were not moving would time stop for us?
Probably not because light particles would force time particles towards us as they came. or light in its travel would carry time or somthing like that.

i think we could slow time if we stoped moving through it but because earth moves we would lose a year till earth came back to pick us up after its orbit. though because of the lack of movement it would seem like a year to the stationary person the clock he held would say different.

why?

the human mind has the capability to percieve much faster than time as long as it is still?? perhaps.

please ignore the randomness whith which i seem to right but my fingers can't seem to keep up with my head

please pick to pieces my theory i seek only to improve it