I broadly classified the forces. Also somehow the concept of gluon is not comforting. This seems more like a hypothetical particle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rybot  Dipa, aren't you excluding a fourth bosonic force i.e. the mesons( two quarks ) are known as the strong nuclear force as oppsoed to gluons which are truly a sub-nculear strong force?
I know that is weird since they are fermions but the spin number identifies them as bosons.
They are exchanged between bayronic particles e.g. protons and protons, proton and neutrons and neuton and neutrons.
I have another concern about threeness which involves simple binary action or non-action( passive )that may or may not have been covered here as the binary enumerations.
I think Tina has a post regarding;
+ aka +1( e.g. postive charge proton )
- aka -1( e.g. negative charge electron )
and 0 aka neutral( chargeless neutron grey area )
My concern is to specific set of circumstances( light switch ) wherein there is *on*( ergo electrons flow ) and *off*( ergo no electron flow ).
There is no grey area between those two that I'm aware of.
Regarding the latter there is only one grey area of consideration in that circumstance and that is of the uncertainty of mind, as to whether the electrons are, or, are not flowing through the switch.
If there is no light bulb( or meter ) to tell us if the electrons are flowing through the switch --or not-- then we need to make a physical observation, by installing light bulb meter whatever.
So we have the physical flow( active ) or no flow( passive ) and then metaphysial abstraction uncertatinty( grey area ) of mind.
Rybo |