[Qspacer]

David, thank you for your reply and attemtion.

I would like to reply to you with a few questions: Does a non-scientist who did not study the terminology of newtonean physics know how to through a ball? Does a dancer know how to balance herself although she hasn't learnt physics? Do you not argree that a sailer may have a much better uderstanding of the physics of sea waves than a physicist who only studies the subject in theory? These people may not use your terminology, but may indeed have a better intuitive understanding of the phenomena.

However I do not only claim to have intuitive understanding. The published article has been examined by certain proffesors of physics in Israel. So far their response was much more open minded than yours and anyway no one has practicly contradicted my claims. If you have any real scientific argument against mine, then I chalange you to present it! I will not hesitate to admit my mistakes if you prove my logic to be wrong. On the contrary I invite anyone to take part in the public discussion. The simple fact is that so far no one has presented any claims against my logic as presented in article1.
I willl just remined you to stick to the arguments presented and discussed in article 1 and not reffer yet to the "highlights" in the appendix, since I predeclared that they will be discussed and explained later on and I am totally aware that they may seem to contradict the present physycs. Imagine Einstein presenting his final theoretical conclusions of relativity without explaining them. Who would have listened to him then? So please wait and the explanations and justifications will gradually be revealed.

As for continuing with my studies. If I will do so, I will not have the time to publish my theory at all. As it is I am already devoting only my spare time after work to this subject. Going back to study will delay everything for nearly a decade. The possibility that I do have the unification theory in my hands is too great to wait anylonger and only the unconfident fear embarracement. I will continue publishing as long as no one will contradict my logic and if the theory has any scientific value it will start impacting on physics within a few years, when it reaches practical tecnological applications.

I would just like to remind you that one of the greatest physicists of all times published one of the greatest works of all times while he had no academic degree or support. I am reffering to Einstein and the special relativity he published at 1905.

Thanks
Roi Lotan