[RascalPuff]

Dear Austin:

Thank you more than words can say.

I repeatedly requested a polygraph, while instead, the police influenced psychiatrists to put medical holds on me.

The question, 'Why didn't you report this earlier?' was asked repeatedly.

Of course I couldn't report what I didn't know about, until learning of it through people who realized the 'collaboration' for what it was.

'Why wasn't this reported earlier?' Indeed...

In the immediate wake of the crime, he knew he couldn't stand up under the questioning of experienced police officers, in the presence of two men he was fully aware, knew nothing of the offense. A polygraph, for example, would inevitably have found him precipitating through his own sphincter.

In 1970, when he told me of the issued incident, and that our (now deceased) stepfather was responsible, I asked him if he ever reported it to the police or confronted Bill Oshie (our impeccably irreproachable stepfather).

He replied that he'd not ever reported it to the police, or told Bill Oshie. I asked him how he learned of the incident and if he was sure Bill Oshie did it.

He flatly replied 'I had a hunch', and was evasive about how he learned of the issue.

I said he owed Bill Oshie a confrontation - he replied:
'Why don't you go find him and tell him?'
I resolved, 'That's your obligation'.

It was shortly after that exchange, that I reported this to the police, who consistently questioned why it wasn't reported earlier. As though they didn't understand a word I was explaining to them... Dick Robertson was a computer engineer, a lawyer, and a Master of Business Administration.

Albeit, the original antagonist in this theme made everything perfectly clear, from start to finish.

I own an audiotape recording of the perpetrator blaming our stepfather.
As mentioned earlier, without having reported the crime, that's a felony of itself.

Who he blamed apparently depended on who he was talking to.

Racial bigots had no trouble perceiving 'the Indian' as culpable.

No one who knew of and participated in it, considered 'the father', as a likely suspect.

Then there is the factor of the wife and children, not wanting to know the truth...

I have since then learned that with the statistical occurrence of such domestic incidents, the father is responsible, 80% of the time. This statistic is then followed by other (almost invariably male) family members, and then, close friends of the family.

Here we have an object lesson in many plateaus - notably, this social travesty seemed to draw in certain types of personalities - individuals who, themselves, were particularly guilty of other trespasses... The 'collaboration' (None Dare Call it 'Conspiracy', which is what it was) apparently bolstered them into feeling 'superior'. People who one might not ever suspect of giving themselves over to something like this, and becoming an active part of it.

There is much to be learned from debacles such as this.

One of it's protective elements is, uninvolved people don't want to talk about it.
(Google 'Presidio pedophile cult' - 'Michael Aquino')
This is an advantage granted to the culpable participants, of course.

Best regards,
- RP