| Re: Question about Life. -
01-08-2008, 03:37 PM
"Can we ever be able to get half of our questions answered? So far, the answers are less than 10% of the questions in any area of human endeavors and answered questions created more new questions along the way. The closer we get toward the knowledge horizon the farther it gets from our reach."
I agree, but to me it comes down to everything being based on fractal motions of what is observed, and like fractal geometry we attempt to count the infinite number of fractals in our search for ultimate knowledge instead of attacking it from the other end to prove that there are no fractals or motion.
For myself, I could never prove what an electron or any particle or wave fundamentally consists of, but I have easily proven that all particles and wave functions are based on arbitrary values of detectible measurements extracted from an absolutely static frame. The old aether experiments lead to one of the largest errors imo. That aether follows all motion and is therefore not detectible, instead of all motion being incrementally recreated according to discrete energies, based on empirical and theoretical science, over time. This way the aether doesn't move and neither do the particles/waves, and many problems are solved without renormalization. |