Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · 07-29-2005, 06:01 AM

Well, I don't know when, but I'm sure that it WILL happen. Science has come to a unification: at the begining, there were hundreds of thousands of theories about each little thing, then came the renaissance, the scientific revolution (the Newtonian one) and this is how things started to unify. Then there was lots of unification for three hundred years. Then the ER and GR came. QM was developped. Everything was being unifyed. It's just that we have to wait, because it is harder to unify these two than anytihng before.

My question is, wouldn't it be un-scientific to have an overall explenation of everything, based on two things that derive uncertainity (relativity and probability)? What are the philosophic implication of their' unification?

	(#2 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48	07-29-2005, 06:01 AM Well, I don't know when, but I'm sure that it WILL happen. Science has come to a unification: at the begining, there were hundreds of thousands of theories about each little thing, then came the renaissance, the scientific revolution (the Newtonian one) and this is how things started to unify. Then there was lots of unification for three hundred years. Then the ER and GR came. QM was developped. Everything was being unifyed. It's just that we have to wait, because it is harder to unify these two than anytihng before. My question is, wouldn't it be un-scientific to have an overall explenation of everything, based on two things that derive uncertainity (relativity and probability)? What are the philosophic implication of their' unification?