[RascalPuff]

Quote:
Light energy is acknowledged to be, to say the least, expanding. Specifically, it is very accurately measured, originally in 1887 by Michelson & Morley, to do so at 186,282 miles-per-second.


expanding ?


define expanding ?


do you mean in direction or in breadth ?

In this context I intend that the expansion is omnidirectional; that is, spherically shaped structures are constantly enlarging outwardly from center points.


Quote:
*Light energy is also acknowledged to be qualitatively identical to *Matter energy; *their differences being only their densities. Light being much more thinly distributed and tenuous than matter. This is proven in the statement 'E=M' of the formula 'E=MC2. Originally published by Einstein in 1906. Light energy or electromagnetism is furthermore acknowledged to invariably originate within and expand-out-of *MatterEnergy - *generator of all spaces and times.


okay


Quote:
On the other hand, MatterEnergy is not acknowledged to be expanding.
Quite the contrary. Matter is unanimously agreed to be static and non-expanding.

of course


Quote:
Digressing To Reality, Geometric & Algebraic Law:
In the formula E=MC2 we have the acknowledged dynamical omni-directional expansion of electromagnetic or light energy, squared from presumably static/non-expanding MatterEnergy.


omni-directional agreed but still is the expansion directional or breadth ?

(Refer above qualification <omnidirectional> - all directions from center)


Quote:

As long as there are those who demand and deny proof of the constant expansion of physical matter, there will also be those who fail or refuse to recognize the accumulative achievements of historical and contemporary Academic Physical Science - and, the lessons of Algebra 101.
and of course those that see 3D see the contradiction of expansion of physical matter . a sphere

(an ever-expanding sphere...)


Quote:
If all the Nobel laureates in the world gather together to agree that any entity acknowledged and agreed to be dynamically expanding, can be algebraically squared from any other entity which is agreed to be static and non-expanding (exactly such a gathering exists, and has existed since 1906):
what is established in such an assemblage of authority is that, none among these mortar-boarded multitudes has possession of the mathematical ability required to pass the seventh grade.

really

(Whether this is true or not is among the issues at hand. Doesn't algebra require the interchangeability of formula factors? I will be grateful for any proper correction here.)


Quote:
Einstein's 'renowned formula' E=MC2 proves again that Universal Matter is literally, constantly and dramatically expanding.


not really

(Until the tentative question regarding the algebraic interchangeability of given formula factors is resolved here, the issue is in suspension.)


Quote:
Clipping right along on this planet at 32 feet per second squared. The Causative Source of the 4-Dimensional Space-Time Continuum: a dimension of time, and motion (are synonymous - time being the interval between two or more events <in space>).


but what you haven't asked is WHY this on this planet we are " clipping " along at all.

The qualified premise is that all constituents of matter (neutrons, protons, electrons, etc) are ever-expanding charges of EM: the same quantity of energy distributed - in the law of the inverse square - over an ever increasing amount of space. The contention is that over-all expansion is inherent to all matter. The same quantity of energy distributing itself over ever increasing space. (No contradiction of the law of conservation of mass-energy.)


time has nothing at all to do with it , other than defining this " clipping " along . if you get my drift.

It is true that time is a measurement of motion; whereas, there is no known condition of non-motion (Absolute Zero K. unobserved and unachieved in experimental endeavor - until further notice, there is no 'rest mass'), hence, there is no known condition bereft of time.


Thanks for your response, north.
- RP