View Single Post
Re: Back for my stoning
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
neutralino
Master
neutralino has a spectacular aura about
 
neutralino's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 736
Thanks Given: 31
Thanked 114x in 97 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep Power: 12
   
Awards Showcase
1st Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Back for my stoning - 01-15-2008, 03:57 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triodit View Post
No, both are ways to describe a mathmatical qwirk. this covers all thing dark. Vacume energy, dark matter & dark energy. We call them dark because our only proof is wonky math.
This is quite an insult really. What do you think the "proof" (although we call it "observational evidence") for dark matter is? What is this "wonky math" of which you speak? I always thought that them major piece of evidence for dark matter was obtained by observing the orbital velocities of members of distant galaxies.

I also find it strange that you seem to think vacuum energy is "proved" by "wonky math." Have you ever studied the Casimir effect?
Quote:
If I err in that statement then fine, just boy cot me. but plaese I'm begging you, tell my how you can prove why I can't be right about light.
Well, that's quite difficult to do, since you have only said one sentence about it. Do you have any mathematics to back you up? How does your theory for "dark matter" match the observational evidence?


~neutralino

If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't been much of a day - John A. Wheeler.
  
Reply With Quote